Thursday, 19 September 2019

Rugby World Cup preview: Rise and shine


POOL A
IRELAND - SCOTLAND - JAPAN - RUSSIA - SAMOA

THE RUGBY World Cup expands its horizons over the next six weeks as the Land of the Rising Sun, Japan, becomes the first ever Asian host of the tournament. 

Notably, it will also be the first edition of this World Cup to be held outside the traditional heartlands of rugby union - although it is only right that the huge strides made in Japanese rugby have been recognised.

Four years ago, the Cherry Blossoms stunned two-time champions South Africa, opting to push for a last-ditch try instead of taking a kick at the posts to secure a still highly creditable tie.

By then, Japan had already been named as the 2019 hosts - but the momentous 34-32 victory in Brighton was more than enough for governing body World Rugby to feel justified in their decision.

Unfortunately for them, the Japanese were subsequently stung by a fixture programme which required them to play Scotland only four days after beating the Springboks - and so the knockout stages remained out of reach.

As hosts this time, the schedule is far kinder to the Cherry Blossoms - but, as England fans can vouch from 2015, home advantage does not necessarily count for much.

Indeed, northern hemisphere standard-bearers Ireland are the obvious favourites to top Pool A as they seek to put their difficult World Cup history behind them on this occasion.

Remarkably, the Irish have never won a single knockout match in the 32 years of this competition - and they have become the archetypal quarter final team, with no fewer than six previous appearances at that stage. 

This time might just be different, though. After all, Ireland head into Japan 2019 in top spot in the rankings, although it is tight between the top five.

Ireland enjoyed an annus mirabalis in 2018 - as they won a Six Nations Grand Slam, a series away in Australia, and beat New Zealand for the second time in two years. 

It is only very recently, though, that the Irish reached the summit following their World Cup warm-up win over Wales in Dublin on 7 September. 

And yet 2019 has not been anywhere near as successful as 2018 as a sketchy third-place finish in the Six Nations was followed by a record defeat in another warm-up to England at Twickenham which belied a lack of squad depth.

Ireland may have peaked too soon for the World Cup having played so well during 2018 - and certainly Scotland will hope that is the case on 22 September. 

Scotland are slowly improving as a team - although, at times, the improvement has been glacial and their record is blighted by a seemingly never-ending inconsistency. 

A runners-up spot in the Pool will almost certainly bring a quarter final match against New Zealand or South Africa - and a likely seventh Scottish exit at that stage. 

Nevertheless, Scotland would do well to avoid being too focused on the Ireland match and instead heed the challenge posed by Japan and Samoa. 

The Japanese will be far less fatigued and far better backed in Yokohama than they were four years ago against the Scots when beaten 45-10 - while two-time quarter finalists Samoa got within three points in Newcastle. 

Samoa will no doubt bring their usual physicality to proceedings - but, having failed to win the annual Pacific Nations Cup since 2014, the islanders have perhaps seen better days

Finally, truly rank outsiders Russia round off the section and are genuinely glad just to have made it after they benefited from Romania and Spain being disqualified for multiple eligibility breaches during qualifying.

Even Bears coach Lyn Jones considers his side has a "mountain to climb", though at least the staging of the tournament in Japan means he will have plenty of choice.


POOL B
NEW ZEALAND - SOUTH AFRICA - ITALY - NAMIBIA - CANADA

For holders and favourites New Zealand - and South Africa - the 2019 Rugby World Cup offers no gentle introduction.

In a repeat of the 1995 Final, the two southern hemisphere giants face each other in a Pool match on just the second day of the tournament (21 September) - and it is expected that the outcome will go a long way to decide which of the pair tops this section.

On for a hat-trick of world titles, New Zealand unsurprisingly begin this defence in their customary position as favourites - but this current side is vulnerable to an upset.

The All Blacks could only draw with South Africa and suffered a record defeat to Australia in Perth so finished the Rugby Championship down in third out of four with only Argentina below them.

Meanwhile, a decade-long unbroken monopoly at the top of the world rankings has twice been broken in the last couple of months by Wales, briefly, and Ireland, currently.

A recovery of sorts brought a phenomenal 36-0 shut-out against the Aussies at Eden Park to retain the Bledisloe Cup and, then more recently, an absolute trouncing of Tonga.

Nevertheless, South Africa sense a big chance of joining the New Zealanders on three World Cups wins after taking the most recent Rugby Championship.

Unbeaten in this calendar year, the Springboks appear to have fully turned the corner after the disastrous reign of Allister Coetzee, in which they lost twice in humiliating fashion by record scores to New Zealand and were even defeated for the first time by Italy.

Now, in terms of qualification for the next stage, Pool B looks the most straightforward of all of the groups.

After all, neither New Zealand or South Africa are likely to face much threat from the other three teams - Italy, Namibia, or Canada.

The Azzurri have been ever-presents at the Rugby World Cup since its inception in 1987 but have yet to make it through the group stages - although, in fairness, they have regularly been pitted against the All Blacks.

Their next meeting in Toyota on 12 October will be a sixth World Cup Pool match between the teams with New Zealand coming out on top in all five previous clashes by an average of almost 60 points.

Certainly, hopes of a massive shock are not high for an Italian team which has won just one Six Nations match out of the last 30 since the start of the 2014 campaign and lost all three warm-up fixtures against Tier I opponents.

But, having recorded two wins and two losses at each of the four editions held from 2003 onwards, yet another third-place finish in Japan will once again guarantee them a spot at the 2023 edition in France.

Namibia, similarly, are regular qualifiers for the Rugby World Cup - which, incidentally, for the first time in its history, has no teams making their debut.

The Welwitschias have, in fact, qualified for a sixth World Cup in succession – but they head into their first Pool match against Italy on 22 September looking to avoid defeat for the first time on the big stage.

Perhaps a better chance for Namibia will present itself on 13 October when they take on a Canada team ranked only just above them.

Historically, the Canucks have been pretty competitive and even reached the quarter finals in 1991.

However, in more recent times, the North Americans’ star has dwindled - they were the last team to qualify for Japan 2019 and the four defeats out of four at the 2015 tournament was their worst return yet.


POOL C
ENGLAND - FRANCE - ARGENTINA - UNITED STATES - TONGA

AFTER four long years, England at last have the chance to bury the ghoulish memories of 2015 when they became the first ever Rugby World Cup hosts to drop out at the Pool stage.

English rugby suffered considerable embarrassment at that failure - but, under Australian head coach Eddie Jones, there has subsequently been a steady recovery.

Now ranked third heading into the World Cup, England are considered by many people to be the most likely side to knock New Zealand off their perch.

There have, after all, been some seriously impressive results since 2015 and, in this period, England can boast a winning record against all of the other Tier I teams - except for the All Blacks.

Equally, though, England remain an incredibly flaky outfit against all of their major opponents, something which was neatly demonstrated in the Six Nations earlier this year.

Not only did England give up a half-time lead in Cardiff to end up losing 21-13 to Wales, it was followed by an even bigger collapse from 31-0 up to 38-38 in the draw against Scotland at Twickenham.

Worryingly, a six-week tournament will run long enough to expose those frailties again - although England are far from the most fragile team in Pool C.

France used to be regularly criticised for their own lack of consistency - but, if anything, this problem has been replaced by something even worse.

Les Bleus, quite frankly, are a soft touch nowadays, failing to win in 55 of their 89 matches (61.8%) since they reached the World Cup Final in 2011.

The 44-8 thrashing at Twickenham in February was France's biggest defeat to England since they lost 37-0 in 1911, as well as their biggest loss to any team in the Five or Six Nations since that same match.

It hardly bodes well for French hopes in a repeat of the fixture to be staged on 12 October in Yokohama - and, instead, the Pool opener against Argentina on 21 September looks like a much bigger encounter.

France are marginal favourites for the clash in the Japanese capital Tokyo - but it should perhaps be the other way around.

True, the Argentines have picked up the Wooden Spoon in the Rugby Championship in all but one of the eight years in which they have competed, including each of the last four.

But there are gradual signs that regular exposure to top level southern hemisphere rugby is having a positive effect.

For instance, the Buenos Aires-based Jaguares club became the first Argentine team to reach the Super Rugby final - and they now supply no fewer than 26 of Los Ticos' 31 players.

Argentina, of course, are no strangers to the latter stages of a World Cup, having reached the semi finals in both 2007 and 2015 - so another deep run cannot be discounted this time around either.

Tonga and the United States - the Sea Eagles and the Eagles respectively - complete the Pool C line-up, and their tie in Osaka on the last day of the group phase will likely to decide which of the teams finishes in fourth place.

Now, undoubtedly, the Tongans have previously had some fine days at the Rugby World Cup, not least their 19-14 victory over France in 2011, a repeat of which will take place in Kumamoto on 6 October.

However, in their most recent outings, the Sea Eagles finished down in fifth place in the Pacific Nations Cup before being hammered 92-7 by New Zealand.

By contrast, the Americans have had some pretty decent results inside the last 15 months including victories over Scotland and Samoa twice.

A fourth win in World Cup matches is within the grasp of the Eagles' talons. 


POOL D
AUSTRALIA - WALES - GEORGIA - FIJI - URUGUAY

WALES face some familiar foes in Pool D as they attempt to reach a first ever World Cup Final at the third attempt under long-serving legendary Kiwi coach Warren Gatland.

Under Gatland, Wales have reestablished themselves as a major force in world rugby, rising from 10th in the rankings when he took over to their present position of fifth.

On the way, the Welsh have won the Grand Slam in the Six Nations on three occasions and reached a World Cup semi final in 2011, only to lose to eventual runners-up France.

This time, Gatland's charges have again been grouped alongside Australia, the pair having been pooled together at the last World Cup with both qualifying for the knockout stages at the expense of hosts England.

Australia went on to reach the Final, where they were soundly defeated by an all-conquering All Blacks side - but hopes Down Under of a repeat of appearance in the showpiece event on 2 November are unusually low.

The Aussies have dropped to sixth in the rankings and, since the last World Cup, hold a losing record against all of the sides above them, except for Wales.

In fact, Australia have lost all six of their most recent matches against England and also suffered a home series against Ireland for the first time since 1979.

Moreover, the most recent match against Pool rivals Wales ended in defeat - hardly an encouraging sign - while, astonishingly, it is now 17 years since the Wallabies have held the annual Bledisloe Cup series contested against New Zealand.

Australia will no doubt take some confidence from their excellent 47-26 win in Perth over the All Blacks just over five weeks ago - but a lot of the positivity from that was rapidly extinguished by the chastening shut out seven days later at Eden Park.

Certainly then, it would be fair to say that the Welsh would fancy themselves in the clash between the expected top two on 29 September in Tokyo.

However, it would equally fair to say that Wales have mixed memories of facing Pacific islanders Fiji in previous World Cups.

In 2007, the Fijians stunned the Welsh to win 38-34 in an incident-packed match laden which had nine tries altogether.

The Welsh, however, got their revenge four years later in Hamilton by becoming the first team in World Cup history to shut out Fiji in a 66-0 thrashing.

Fiji took a while to recover from that humiliating reverse but won four successive Pacific Nations Cups between 2015 and 2018.

Nevertheless, the most recent edition of that tournament this year saw Japan finish above the Flying Fijians - and so it would be most sensible if the islanders focused instead on their game against Georgia on 3 October in Osaka.

After all, the Georgians appear to be the real wildcards in Pool D. Four years ago, victories over Tonga and Namibia ensured a top-three group place and automatic qualification for this tournament.

However, that highly credible achievement will be tough to match with Fiji in the group - and Georgia missed their cue in their most recent big fixture against Italy last November.

Billed as a possible opening to a Six Nations place for the Georgians as a replacement to the tiresomely ineffective Italians, Georgia were beaten 28-17 by the Azzurri.

And so the likelihood of the biggest European teams visiting Tbilisi regularly has receded - for now.

Lastly, Uruguay complete the line-up for the 2019 Rugby World Cup, meaning Pool D distinctly resembles Pool A in 2015, only with Georgia in place of England.

Back then, the Uruguayans were, rather romantically, the only remaining amateur team at the tournament.

But things have moved on a touch in the intervening period and Los Teros can now boast total of 18 professional players in their ranks.

That is still short of a full squad, of course - and, in such a competitive section as this, the South Americans will do well to make much impact at all.


PREDICTION
▪️ Pool winners: Ireland, New Zealand, England, Wales
▪️ Pool runners-up: Scotland, South Africa, Argentina, Australia
▪️ Semi finalists: New Zealand v England, South Africa v Wales
▪️ FINAL South Africa beat England

Monday, 9 September 2019

Scintillating Smith puts Ashes beyond England


ASHES SERIES 2019
SERIES DRAWN 2-2
AUSTRALIA RETAINED THE ASHES
01-05 Aug1 Australia 284 & 487-7dec beat England 374 & 146 by 251 runs Edgbaston
14-18 Aug2 Australia 250 & 154-6 drew with England 258 & 258-5decLord's
22-26 Aug3 England 67 & 362-9 beat Australia 179 & 246 by one wicketHeadingley
04-08 Sep4 Australia 497-8dec & 186-6dec beat England 301 & 197 by 185 runsOld Trafford
12-15 Sep5 England 294 & 329 beat Australia 225 & 263 by 135 runs The Oval

ENGLAND crashed out of Ashes contention with one match left to play as Australia took an unassailable 2-1 lead in the series with victory late on the final day of the fourth Test.

Josh Hazlewood trapped Craig Overton plumb lbw to bring a reasonably gutsy England resistance to an end - but the plaudits in this series must be mainly reserved instead for former Aussie skipper Steve Smith.

Disgraced in a ball-tampering scandal which rocked Australian cricket in the early part of last year, Smith has gone a long a way to redeem himself by playing almost perfectly since his return to the team this summer.

The Sydney man has scored totals of 144, 142, 92, 211 and 82, and so averages a rather ridiculous 134.20.

He basically only seems to get out when he gets bored - and it feels like England have basically given up trying to get him out otherwise.

It was no surprise then that, with a chance to retain the Ashes with victory at Old Trafford, Australia opted to bat and attempt to set a total, despite the unsettled weather.

England, by contrast, hoped to get the Aussies out cheaply to take control of the game and series - and Stuart Broad delivered two early wickets following a complete washout of the first session of day one.

But from the somewhat awkward position of 28-2, Australia progressed serenely without further loss to 144 as Smith embarked on yet another odyssey of an innings.

At 144-3, Smith lost Marnus Labuschagne as a partner, the latter having replaced the former as the first ever concussion substitute in Test cricket in the rainy draw in the second match at Lord's.

Labuschagne himself did well at the crease and he deservedly retained his place in the team for the third Test at Headingley and again at Old Trafford, even despite the return of Smith.

Further contributions down the order from current captain Tim Paine (58) and Mitchell Starc (54 not out) helped the Aussies eventually post an imposing 497-8 before their declaration after tea on day two.

Unsurprisingly, England began tentatively and began a delayed day three with nightwatchman Overton at the crease following the dismissal of opener Joe Denly (4) for another cheap score on the previous evening.

Overton himself lasted less than two overs of the new day and, at 25-2, it looked as if England might be rolled over quite easily.

Instead, Rory Burns and Joe Root finally showed some resistance and took England through to tea without any further damage.

But both men fell within 17 balls of each other and, by the end of day three, Starc had also managed to remove Jonny Bairstow.

A better forecast for the weekend suggested that, despite rain affecting two of the first three days, there would still be a result in this match. England, however, were well behind in the game.

At least there was the reassuring Ben Stokes was at the crease as day before began - but, this time, there was no repeat of his Headingley heroics and, when he edged Starc to Smith at second slip, England were 243-7 with only Jos Buttler and tail remaining.

Buttler made 41 as England narrowly edged past a follow-on which was not likely to have been enforced in any case - and, left without the choice, Australia set about quick runs with which to kill off the hosts.

This did not exactly go to plan, though, as opener David Warner landed a pair with a third successive duck to add to his other scores in this series of two, eight, three, five and 61.

Warner was also banned following the sandpaper scandal and, even before then, had a somewhat chequered disciplinary past.

Unlike Smith though, he still has nothing to be proud of. He has contributed little of note to this series.

Having reduced Australia to 44-4, England appeared to be stumbling their way back into another match - but Smith remained resolutely immovable as he put on yet another century stand, this time with Matthew Wade.

Smith was eventually out for 82 - his lowest score of the series - though only after having opted to play the reverse sweep in an attempt to chase quick runs.

Four overs later, Australia declared for a second time in the match, setting England a record target of 383, 24 runs more than they had required in Leeds.

More likely, England would need to bat out time and secure a draw which would keep the contest for the urn alive until the fifth and final Test at the Oval this week.

But that did not seem too likely at all when the main contributors from the first innings - Burns and Root - were both out for ducks to Pat Cummins by the end of the first over.

England were 0-2 with Denly and Jason Roy at the crease, both players whose selection has been subject to much criticism. Somehow both players made it to the close of play on day four.

By lunch on day five, however, England were 87-4. Denly was still there, to his credit - but Roy was bowled through the gate by Cummins for 31 and Stokes fell shortly afterwards.

A further two wickets followed in the next session to leave England at tea on 166-6 with 36 overs left to play and Buttler as the only specialist batsman remaining.

Hazlewood would account for the Somerset man after he misjudged a leave and the ball cannoned into the top of off-stump - and Jofra Archer was lbw to Nathan Lyon in the following over.

With Overton and Leach at the crease, England appeared to exhale one last breath of hope into saving the match, as the pair was able to survive through 14 overs.

But Leach was eventually caught by Wade at short-leg off the part-time off-spin of Labuschagne – and, 10 balls later, Hazlewood trapped Overton lbw.

Overton, of course, had a review to use up - but the check showed the decision by on-field umpire Kumar Dharmasena was good and so merely confirmed that it was over for Overton and over for England.

Australia have retained the Ashes and have at the very least avoided defeat in a Test series in England for the first time in 18 years. It could and should get better than that, of course.

Victory at the Oval would result in Australia taking the series 3-1, which coincidentally would be the same score that England achieved when winning away in the Ashes in 2010-11.

And, on the balance of play so far, that would feel just about right, if only to demonstrate the stranglehold which Smith has had over the English bowlers.

Hazlewood and Cummins, meanwhile, have enjoyed similar dominance over a home batting line-up which, save for a few outstanding exceptions, remains as sketchy as ever.

During his post-match press conference, captain Root, perhaps understandably, was not slow to focus on the Headingley heist and other occasional bright moments which had kept England's hopes alive.

But Root will also surely be aware that he has never really convinced in the leadership role and that it has undoubtedly had an effect on his performances with the bat.

Furthermore, the departure of head coach Trevor Bayliss at the end of this summer acts as the natural end to a cycle in which the focus of the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has been unashamedly on white-ball cricket at the expense of the longest form of the game.

In this regard, the policy has been successful - England have become the world's best One Day International team and won the ICC World Cup for the first time ever.

But the Test team, which was itself ranked number one back in 2011, has unquestionably suffered and it is now instead marooned in the middle of the rankings list with little sign of improvement on the way.

After all, it will take more than a change of coach, captain, or both to make England more competitive again in the Test arena.

Pertinently, the County Championship resumes this week with three rounds of fixtures yet to be completed.

Ever more, the Championship gets shoved to the margins of the season - and the outlook of a change of tack from the ECB looks bleak considering 2020 finally brings about the much-derided arrival of the Hundred.

For sure, this Ashes defeat hurts - as Ashes defeats invariably do - but, to be fair, this World Cup-winning, record chase-breaking summer has still been an amazing, joyous rollercoaster for English cricket.

Now, though, there simply must be some sort of realignment made by the ECB between red-ball and white-ball cricket.

Otherwise, innings such as those by Stokes at Headingley, and Smith pretty much everywhere, will become a dying art.

Moreover, as dramatic as it sounds, glorious summers for English cricket could even become a thing of the past.

CENTURIES
211 Steve Smith (Australia), fourth Test
144 Steve Smith (Australia), first Test
142 Steve Smith (Australia), first Test
135* Ben Stokes (England), third Test
133 Rory Burns (England), first Test
115* Ben Stokes (England), second Test
117 Matthew Wade (Australia), fifth Test
110 Matthew Wade (Australia), first Test

FIVE-FORS
6-45 Jofra Archer (England), third Test
6-62 Jofra Archer (England), fifth Test
6-49 Nathan Lyon (Australia), first Test
5-30 Josh Hazlewood (Australia), third Test
5-46 Mitchell Marsh (Australia), fifth Test
5-86 Stuart Broad (England), first Test

MOST RUNS
774 Steve Smith (Australia) @ 110.57
441 Ben Stokes (England) @ 55.12
390 Rory Burns (England) @ 39.00
353 Marnus Labaschagne (Australia) @ 50.42
337 Matthew Wade (Australia) @ 33.70
325 Joe Root (England) @ 32.50
312 Joe Denly (England) @ 31.20
247 Jos Buttler (England) @ 24.70
214 Jonny Bairstow (England) @ 23.77
191 Travis Head (Australia) @ 27.28

MOST WICKETS
29 Pat Cummins (Australia) @ 19.62
23 Stuart Broad (England) @ 26.65 
22 Jofra Archer (England) @ 20.27
20 Josh Hazlewood (Australia) @ 21.85
20 Nathan Lyon (Australia) @ 33.40
12 Jack Leach (England) @ 25.83
10 Chris Woakes (England) @ 33.10
8 Ben Stokes (England) @ 45.25